David Ortez resumes & CV records
Resumes
David Ortez
Legal Assistant At Crews Wenberg, Pllc
Position:
Legal Assistant at Crews Wenberg, PLLC
Location:
Houston, Texas
Industry:
Law Practice
Work:
Crews Wenberg, PLLC
- Houston, Texas since Jan 2013
Legal Assistant Harris County - Houston, Texas May 2011 - Aug 2011
Judicial Law Clerk in 125th District Civil Court Crews Wenberg, PLLC - Houston, Texas Jan 2009 - Aug 2011
Legal Assistant
Legal Assistant Harris County - Houston, Texas May 2011 - Aug 2011
Judicial Law Clerk in 125th District Civil Court Crews Wenberg, PLLC - Houston, Texas Jan 2009 - Aug 2011
Legal Assistant
Education:
Thurgood Marshall School of Law 2010 - 2013
J.D., Law The University of Texas at Austin 2004 - 2006
Bachelor of Arts (BA), Government
J.D., Law The University of Texas at Austin 2004 - 2006
Bachelor of Arts (BA), Government
Skills:
Trial Advocacy, Legal Research, Mediation, Legal Writing, Public Policy, Intellectual Property, Politics, PowerPoint, Litigation Support, Government, Social Media, Legislation, Trial Practice, Research, Outlook, Appeals, Commercial Litigation, Public Speaking, Microsoft Excel, Litigation, Legal Assistance, Motions, Trials
Interests:
running, reading, designing, international travel, sports, digital photography
Honor & Awards:
Dean's List, Fall 2011 and Spring 2012
Languages:
Spanish
Portuguese
Portuguese
Awards:
Helen Dawn Williams Mock Trial Champion
Board of Advocates
The Helen Dawn Williams Mock Trial Competition promotes greater interest among law students in litigation and provides a means for them to practice and improve their trial skills. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the trial process. The simulations consist of a direct examination, cross examination, and opening and closing statements.
Excellence for the Future Award
CALI Award
For excellent achievement and the highest grade in the study of Trial Simulation.
Henry E. Doyle Moot Court Competition Semi-Finalist and Best Brief
Board of Advocates
The Henry E. Doyle Moot Court Competition promotes greater interest among law students in appellate advocacy and provides a means for them to practice and improve their oral arguments. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the appellate process. The simulations consist of each party submitting a written brief before delivering their oral argument in a case taking turns to speak directly to the judge or judges with an equal amount of time allotted to each.
Student Trial Advocacy Competition Regional Semi-Finalist
American Association for Justice
The Student Trial Advocacy Competition (AAJ STAC) is one of the largest annual mock trial competitions for law students in the United States.
Prestage Woods Negotiations Finalist
Board of Advocates
The Prestage Woods Negotiation Competition promotes greater interest among law students in legal negotiation and provides a means for them to practice and improve their negotiating skills. The competition simulates legal negotiations in which law students, acting as lawyers, negotiate a series of legal problems. The simulations consist of a common set of facts known by all participants and confidential information known only to the participants representing a particular side. All of the simulations deal with the same general topic, but the negotiation situation varies with each round and level of the competition.
Neal Speedon 1L Moot Court Semi-Finalist
Board of Advocates
The Neal Speedon 1L Moot Court Competition promotes greater interest among law students in appellate advocacy and provides a means for them to practice and improve their oral arguments. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the appellate process. The simulations consist of each party delivering their oral argument in a case taking turns to speak directly to the judge or judges with an equal amount of time allotted to each.
Board of Advocates
The Helen Dawn Williams Mock Trial Competition promotes greater interest among law students in litigation and provides a means for them to practice and improve their trial skills. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the trial process. The simulations consist of a direct examination, cross examination, and opening and closing statements.
Excellence for the Future Award
CALI Award
For excellent achievement and the highest grade in the study of Trial Simulation.
Henry E. Doyle Moot Court Competition Semi-Finalist and Best Brief
Board of Advocates
The Henry E. Doyle Moot Court Competition promotes greater interest among law students in appellate advocacy and provides a means for them to practice and improve their oral arguments. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the appellate process. The simulations consist of each party submitting a written brief before delivering their oral argument in a case taking turns to speak directly to the judge or judges with an equal amount of time allotted to each.
Student Trial Advocacy Competition Regional Semi-Finalist
American Association for Justice
The Student Trial Advocacy Competition (AAJ STAC) is one of the largest annual mock trial competitions for law students in the United States.
Prestage Woods Negotiations Finalist
Board of Advocates
The Prestage Woods Negotiation Competition promotes greater interest among law students in legal negotiation and provides a means for them to practice and improve their negotiating skills. The competition simulates legal negotiations in which law students, acting as lawyers, negotiate a series of legal problems. The simulations consist of a common set of facts known by all participants and confidential information known only to the participants representing a particular side. All of the simulations deal with the same general topic, but the negotiation situation varies with each round and level of the competition.
Neal Speedon 1L Moot Court Semi-Finalist
Board of Advocates
The Neal Speedon 1L Moot Court Competition promotes greater interest among law students in appellate advocacy and provides a means for them to practice and improve their oral arguments. The competition simulates simulates the steps involved in the appellate process. The simulations consist of each party delivering their oral argument in a case taking turns to speak directly to the judge or judges with an equal amount of time allotted to each.