Gareth A Jones, 55Seattle, WA

2012015, Jun 21, 2012

Dec 17, 2010

12/972060

Jens K. Jacobsen - Seattle WA, US
Sadi Khan - Redmond WA, US
Gareth Alun Jones - Issaquah WA, US
Tyler Edward Gibson - Seattle WA, US
Steven Douglas De Mar - Redmond WA, US
Andrew Jude Byrne - Redmond WA, US

Microsoft Corporation - Redmond WA

G06F 3/048
G06F 3/02

345168, 715764

Organizing data where the data has spatial significance. A method includes, at a user interface, displaying to a user a representation of spatially structured data. User input is received at a computer implemented user interface through one or more hardware user interface devices. The user input is domain agnostic, but has a spatial connotation. Based on pre-existing structured data displayed at the user interface, a domain is determined for the user input. Based on the determined domain, the user input is interpreted into a domain specific response. The domain specific response is consistent with the spatial connotation across a plurality of domains.

2013026, Oct 3, 2013

Mar 30, 2012

13/435636

David Charles Kilian - Arlington VA, US
Louisa Rose Millott - Ann Arbor MI, US
Gareth Alun Jones - Issaquah WA, US
Andrew Craig Bragdon - Eastport ME, US
Yu Xiao - Issaquah WA, US
Arun Mathew Abraham - Redmond WA, US
Kevin J. Blasko - Redmond WA, US
Christopher Lovett - Woodinville WA, US
Mark Groves - Monroe WA, US

MICROSOFT CORPORATION - Redmond WA

G06F 7/00

707695, 707E17005, 707E1701

Resolving conflicting changes to structured data files. A method includes for a structured data file which has both a generic structure and dialects built on top of the generic structure, for which conflicting changes have been made, and where an original version of the structured data, a first version of the structured data and a second version of the structured data exist, determining a dialect of the structured data. The method further includes, based on the determined dialect performing at least one of merge or diff operations on the original version of the structured data, the first version of the structured data and the second version of the structured data.

2014000, Jan 2, 2014

Jun 27, 2012

13/533997

Andrew C. Bragdon - Redmond WA, US
Gareth Jones - Issaquah WA, US
Mark A. Groves - Monroe WA, US
Tracey Glass Trewin - Fall City WA, US

MICROSOFT CORPORATION - Redmond WA

G06F 9/44

717113

Aspects of the subject matter described herein relate to assisting software development. In aspects, a software development environment may display code and information about the code on a user interface. In one example, the information includes diagnostic information about the code. The information may be represented by actionable tags that allow the software developer to drill-down and obtain more detailed information about the code. The information may be automatically obtained by the software development environment in a way that does not interfere with the development activities of the software developer. The actionable tags are displayed in close proximity to code with which they are associated.

2014007, Mar 13, 2014

Sep 13, 2012

13/613533

Andrew C. Bragdon - Redmond WA, US
Gareth A. Jones - Issaquah WA, US
Mark Groves - Monroe WA, US
Tracey Trewin - Redmond WA, US

MICROSOFT CORPORATION - Redmond WA

G06F 3/048

715772

A code stream provides a historical view of changes to program code and related actions. The code stream is displayed concurrently with the code for reference, navigation, editing, sharing, and to aid in interruption recovery. The code stream automatically constructs a list of visited code segments based on user changes to the code or navigation within the code. The code stream is an activity history that is constructed based on analysis of user navigation behavior, such as specific edits to the code or dwelling in a section of the code. The user has the ability to undo changes in the code in a non-linear fashion by individually reversing changes from the history listed in the code stream. The user may manually add other non-code items to the code stream.

2018000, Jan 4, 2018

Jun 30, 2016

15/199500

- Redmond WA, US
Vasilios Petrakos - Bellevue WA, US
Yu Ukai - Kawasaki-shi, JP
Yasuhiko Mori - Tokyo, JP
Yasufumi Shiraishi - Tokoyo, JP
Ginger Fang - Bellevue WA, US
Han Jung - Sammamish WA, US
Jin Wang - Kirkland WA, US
Amol Anant Natu - Duvall WA, US
Suleiman Jabbouri - Redmond WA, US
Gareth Alun Jones - Snoqualmie WA, US
Jay Ongg - Renton WA, US
Darren Austin - Seattle WA, US
Xing Fan - Tokyo, JP
Brian Hardy - Duvall WA, US

Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC. - Redmond WA

H04L 29/08
H04L 29/06

A non-limiting example method includes receiving a request to publish content that is stored on a user storage server in a personal data store. The method includes preparing the content for publication and moving the prepared content to a content repository to generate published content. The method includes receiving a request to make a personal copy of the published content and making a copy of the published content in a personal data store in a user storage server. The copy is independently editable of the published content. A non-limiting example system includes an application programming interface that includes a publish command to generate a published copy of a specified first content stored in a first personal data store in a content repository, and a retrieve command that generates a personal copy of a specified second content stored in the content repository in a second personal data store.

2017031, Nov 2, 2017

Dec 12, 2016

15/376085

- Redmond WA, US
Louisa Rose Millott - Ann Arbor MI, US
Gareth Alun Jones - Issaquah WA, US
Andrew Craig Bragdon - Eastport ME, US
Yu Xiao - Issaquah WA, US
Arun Mathew Abraham - Redmond WA, US
Kevin J. Blasko - Redmond WA, US
Christopher Lovett - Woodinville WA, US
Mark Groves - Monroe WA, US

G06F 17/22
G06F 17/27
G06F 17/22

Resolving conflicting changes to structured data files. A method includes for a structured data file which has both a generic structure and dialects built on top of the generic structure, for which conflicting changes have been made, and where an original version of the structured data, a first version of the structured data and a second version of the structured data exist, determining a dialect of the structured data. The method further includes, based on the determined dialect performing at least one of merge or diff operations on the original version of the structured data, the first version of the structured data and the second version of the structured data.

2017031, Nov 2, 2017

Sep 12, 2016

15/263323

- Redmond WA, US
Yanir Shahak - Sammamish WA, US
Wei Wang - Bellevue WA, US
Jorge Eugenio Aguirre Gonzalez - Redmond WA, US
Jay Ongg - Renton WA, US
Darren Glenn Austin - Seattle WA, US
Gareth Alun Jones - Snoqualmie WA, US
Rahee Ghosh - Cambridge MA, US
Ankit Srivastava - Vancouver, CA
Guy Daher - Vancouver, CA
Kiky Wibowo Tangerine - Vancouver, CA
Mun Ying Leong - Vancouver, CA

Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC. - Redmond WA

G06F 17/24
H04L 12/58
G06F 17/22

Freeform input is not native to several application or document types, but is desired by users as an input mode, especially for collaboration. Systems and methods are therefore provided to enable the insertion of an electronic collaboration workspace that accepts and stores freeform input for use as an object embeddable in various documents. An external host application provides the functionalities needed for freeform input, and the inputs may be committed to the document or stored as a separate document which may be referenced and accessed by multiple users for purposes of collaboration.

2017009, Mar 30, 2017

Dec 13, 2016

15/377702

- Redmond WA, US
Brian HOLLEY - Kirkland WA, US
Greg AKSELROD - Seattle WA, US
Ryan JAMES - Seattle WA, US
Yan ZHEN - Bellevue WA, US
Gareth A. JONES - Issaquah WA, US
Danny AMIRAULT - Seattle WA, US

Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC - Redmond WA

G06F 11/07

This document relates to preserving input data. One example includes obtaining a request that a service perform processing on input data to produce an output representation of the input data. This example also includes applying criteria to the request, and preserving the input data responsive to determining that the criteria are met.