BackgroundCheck.run
Search For

Johnna Renee Carter, 56Addison, TX

Johnna Carter Phones & Addresses

Addison, TX   

Angleton, TX   

Houston, TX   

3507 Newhaven Dr, Richardson, TX 75082    972-9072782   

3803 Marshfield Dr, Richardson, TX 75082   

18625 Midway Rd, Dallas, TX 75287   

Grapevine, TX   

Argyle, TX   

Osceola, AR   

Irving, TX   

Plano, TX   

Colton, TX   

Social networks

Johnna Renee Carter

Linkedin

Mentions for Johnna Renee Carter

Johnna Carter resumes & CV records

Resumes

Johnna Carter Photo 24

Johnna Carter

Publications & IP owners

Us Patents

Control Transparency Framework

US Patent:
8256004, Aug 28, 2012
Filed:
Oct 29, 2008
Appl. No.:
12/260422
Inventors:
Marshell L. Hill - Flower Mound TX, US
Tianay Carroll - Coppell TX, US
Johnna Carter - Richardson TX, US
Chris Higgins - Charlotte NC, US
Chad Renfro - Dalls TX, US
Dan Yomine - Trophy Club TX, US
Assignee:
Bank of America Corporation - Charlotte NC
International Classification:
G06F 11/00
H04L 9/32
US Classification:
726 25, 726 26, 726 27, 726 28, 726 29, 726 30, 713187, 713188, 713189, 713190
Abstract:
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods, systems and computer program products for a control transparency framework which is, in one embodiment, a transparent (i. e. easy to understand) and actionable risk/reward approach for organizational processes, controls, training and development. The control transparency framework method includes identifying threats to an organization, developing a risk score for each of the threats to develop a threat portfolio, developing a maturity portfolio, developing a control portfolio, determining a gap portfolio, and developing a control transparency portfolio to close gaps. A gap exists between a target state maturity level of each identified threat and a current maturity level of each control assigned to handle each identified threat, such that the gap occurs if the target state maturity level is at a level that is lower than the control maturity level.

Control Automation Tool

US Patent:
2010019, Aug 5, 2010
Filed:
Feb 26, 2010
Appl. No.:
12/713775
Inventors:
Marshell L. Hill - Flower Mound TX, US
Daniel Yomine - Trophy Club TX, US
Dennis Aligno - Plano TX, US
Johnna Carter - Richardson TX, US
Tianay Carroll - Coppell TX, US
Ajay Barve - Coppell TX, US
Assignee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION - Charlotte NC
International Classification:
G06F 21/00
US Classification:
726 25
Abstract:
A control automation tool (“CAT”) is configured for supporting discrete management of controls and their corresponding metrics. The control automation tool includes a software application connected with, stored on, and executed by one or more relational, closed-loop data repositories and computer systems. The use and maturation of a control within an organization depends on management of operational performance and expenses, which the CAT assists through lean project management, effective implementation of action plans and financial functions. Further, people resources, organizational hierarchy and access management functions are used to support mapping of controls arranged by organizational unit and support access permissions that are consistent with appropriate data management. The CAT also provides transparency and meaning to control and metric status and relevant data regarding controls and their associated metrics and is configured for ease of control and metric management via the CAT interface.

Dynamically Monitoring System Controls To Identify And Mitigate Issues

US Patent:
2021005, Feb 25, 2021
Filed:
Aug 19, 2019
Appl. No.:
16/543759
Inventors:
- Charlotte NC, US
Johnna Carter - Richardson TX, US
Bradley P. Welch - Fort Mill SC, US
Christofer Hoff - Charlotte NC, US
International Classification:
G06F 21/55
G06N 20/00
G05B 19/042
Abstract:
Arrangements for dynamic system control evaluation and issue identification and mitigation are provided. In some examples, data may be received from a plurality of sources. The data may be received in batches at predetermined intervals or time periods, and/or as streaming data. In some examples, a first system control may be identified and a first system control value may be determined for the first system control. A plurality of threshold ranges associated with the first system control may be identified and the first system control value may be compared to the plurality of threshold ranges. Based on the comparing, the first system control value may be mapped to an objective score on a cyber health scale. The objective score may then be evaluated to determine whether an issue is occurring or is likely to occur. If so, one or more mitigation actions may be identified and implemented.

NOTICE: You may not use BackgroundCheck or the information it provides to make decisions about employment, credit, housing or any other purpose that would require Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) compliance. BackgroundCheck is not a Consumer Reporting Agency (CRA) as defined by the FCRA and does not provide consumer reports.